Quantum Queen X review: a smooth result with a hidden grid
Verdict: the result rests on averaging, and nothing in the audit shows how that risk is contained. The run has no trade in the first 14.7 years of available data; the report does not show whether the EA or the price data causes that silence.
| What matters | Measured result |
|---|---|
| Profit after costs | 4,597.04 USD |
| Completed trades | 3,357 |
| Largest open stack | 17 positions |
| Failed entry attempts | 21 (plus 38 failed closes) |
The calm balance line hides the main risk
The audit finds averaging into adverse moves. It records 1,346 entries added while an open basket was losing, compared with only 3 added with the move. That pattern can look smooth while positions accumulate against the account.
Most of the available history was unused
The first observed trade was on January 17, 2018. The strategy therefore did not demonstrate how it would have behaved through the earlier market periods included in the chart.
Costs and execution still matter
Swap cost 349.87 USD, exceeding the 268.56 USD commission charge. The audit also records failed entry attempts, adding another reason not to treat the historical profit as a dependable live outcome.
The result is profitable after recorded costs, but profitability is not the same as resilience. The grid structure and the missing early record are what the audit measures against this result.
Every verdict lamp in the catalog is public on the audit pages. Your own tester report? The browser check is free.