Quantum Queen MT5 review: the long history starts late

A concise evidence review. Read the audit.

Verdict: Quantum Queen earned 4,597.04 USD, but its first trade came 14.7 years into the available history. It also added 1,346 positions against losing baskets, so the smooth final balance hides a serious exposure risk.

What mattersMeasured result
Completed trades3,357
Net profit after costs4,597.04 USD
Adverse position adds1,346
Maximum simultaneous positions17

The headline history overstates the evidence

The available record begins in May 2003, but Quantum Queen did not open its first trade until January 2018. That leaves 5,371 days without a trade. The useful evidence is therefore the active period from 2018 onward, not the full date range shown at the top of the result.

The balance curve is calm because the lot size is small

The measured run used a fixed 0.01 lot and produced 4,597.04 USD after commission and swap. Reexpressing the same path against the recommended 1,000 USD deposit does not model whether a smaller account could carry every open position. The low percentage drawdown should not be read as proof that the account size is safe.

The basket structure is the main risk

Quantum Queen added 1,346 entries while an open basket was losing and reached 17 simultaneous positions. Position size did not escalate, but exposure still accumulated as price moved against the basket. That behavior can turn a quiet record into a concentrated loss when a move persists.

The measured result is profitable, but the late start and the basket exposure leave open questions. Judge the active period and the open position count before treating the final balance as representative.

Every verdict lamp in the catalog is public on the audit pages. Your own tester report? The browser check is free.

Related: all audits · more articles

More from the blog

What our software tests can establish

Constructed examples check capital bases, changing position sizes and insufficient history. Their expected answers explain software behavior, with a clear limit on what they establish about an EA.

Two tests in one journal: the field that says which run an audit read

All 33 audit files in our catalog on 4 September 2026 carried the tester journal next to the report and pair every trade from it. In two of them the journal holds two test runs, and only the last one counts because MT5 starts its order numbers over with every test. Logan pairs 1,372 trades out of such a file at full coverage, and in 285 of them the journal names an entry that a first in first out rule would have missed.