CryonX EA MT5 review: $0.84 of cost headroom per trade
CryonX earned +$3,456.01 across 4,127 trades in the gold backtest. An extra $1.00 per trade turns that result into a -$670.99 loss.
Updated 2026-09-06: clarified account-size risk and removed unsupported safety and reproducibility claims.
How much extra cost the profit can absorb
The recorded trade size stayed fixed at 0.01 lots, with at most one position open. The audit stores a break-even allowance of $0.84 per trade for additional costs.
| Extra cost per trade | Net result |
|---|---|
| $0.50 | +$1,392.51 |
| $1.00 | -$670.99 |
| $2.00 | -$4,797.99 |
These scenarios add to the costs already included in the result. They show the available margin for worse execution, without predicting what a particular broker will charge.
A small account still carries substantial risk
At the same trade sizes, the daily balance model shows a maximum drawdown of 36.93% on $500. The observed path also crosses the stored prop-account loss limits at that balance.
The stored prop-fit verdict is red because the best day's share of annual profit breaches the modeled consistency limit in 3 calendar years. This annual proxy does not determine actual payout eligibility.
The dated slice after the last recorded update contains 173 trades and loses $59.52. Its date alone cannot establish that the developer had never used that history.
The small-account model holds trade sizes constant and omits margin requirements, so it can understate risk.
Read the CryonX audit for the complete cost scenarios, account-size comparison and dated results.
Every verdict lamp in the catalog is public on the audit pages. Your own tester report? The browser check is free.